The Edvocate

Top Menu

Main Menu

  • Start Here
    • Our Brands
    • Governance
      • Lynch Education Consulting, LLC.
      • Dr. Lynch’s Personal Website
      • Careers
    • Write For Us
    • Books
    • The Tech Edvocate Product Guide
    • Contact Us
    • The Edvocate Podcast
    • Edupedia
    • Pedagogue
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • PreK-12
    • Assessment
    • Assistive Technology
    • Best PreK-12 Schools in America
    • Child Development
    • Classroom Management
    • Early Childhood
    • EdTech & Innovation
    • Education Leadership
    • Equity
    • First Year Teachers
    • Gifted and Talented Education
    • Special Education
    • Parental Involvement
    • Policy & Reform
    • Teachers
  • Higher Ed
    • Best Colleges and Universities
    • Best College and University Programs
    • HBCU’s
    • Diversity
    • Higher Education EdTech
    • Higher Education
    • International Education
  • Advertise
  • The Tech Edvocate Awards
    • The Awards Process
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2026 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2025 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2024 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2023 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2021 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2022 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2020 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2019 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2018 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2017 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Award Seals
  • Apps
    • GPA Calculator for College
    • GPA Calculator for High School
    • Cumulative GPA Calculator
    • Grade Calculator
    • Weighted Grade Calculator
    • Final Grade Calculator
  • The Tech Edvocate
  • Post a Job
  • AI Powered Personal Tutor

logo

The Edvocate

  • Start Here
    • Our Brands
    • Governance
      • Lynch Education Consulting, LLC.
      • Dr. Lynch’s Personal Website
        • My Speaking Page
      • Careers
    • Write For Us
    • Books
    • The Tech Edvocate Product Guide
    • Contact Us
    • The Edvocate Podcast
    • Edupedia
    • Pedagogue
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • PreK-12
    • Assessment
    • Assistive Technology
    • Best PreK-12 Schools in America
    • Child Development
    • Classroom Management
    • Early Childhood
    • EdTech & Innovation
    • Education Leadership
    • Equity
    • First Year Teachers
    • Gifted and Talented Education
    • Special Education
    • Parental Involvement
    • Policy & Reform
    • Teachers
  • Higher Ed
    • Best Colleges and Universities
    • Best College and University Programs
    • HBCU’s
    • Diversity
    • Higher Education EdTech
    • Higher Education
    • International Education
  • Advertise
  • The Tech Edvocate Awards
    • The Awards Process
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2026 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2025 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2024 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2023 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2021 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2022 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2020 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2019 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2018 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2017 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Award Seals
  • Apps
    • GPA Calculator for College
    • GPA Calculator for High School
    • Cumulative GPA Calculator
    • Grade Calculator
    • Weighted Grade Calculator
    • Final Grade Calculator
  • The Tech Edvocate
  • Post a Job
  • AI Powered Personal Tutor
  • Bill Gates’ Dire Prediction: Could AI in Education Actually Make Students Learn LESS?

  • Bill Gates’ Dire Warning: Why These Reskilling Programs Are Now Essential

  • Bill Gates’ Dire Prediction: AI Could Be Making Our Kids Dumber

  • Bill Gates’ Disturbing Prediction: AI Could Make Students Learn LESS

  • 10 Crucial Differences: Public University Budget Crisis vs. Private College Stability

  • The Brutal Truth: 9 Surprising Career Paths for Laid-Off University Staff

  • Catastrophic: Why University Budget Cuts Are Obliterating Faculty Job Security

  • The Brutal Truth: Why Your University’s Budget Crisis Is Worse Than You Think

  • The Brutal Truth: Why One Oregon District Is Crushing Consolidation While Another Falters

  • Oregon Teacher Layoffs: 10 Courses That Could Save Your Career

Assessment
Home›Assessment›Grading on a Curve – What Is It?

Grading on a Curve – What Is It?

By Matthew Lynch
December 18, 2020
0
Spread the love

The term grading on a curve describes the various methods a teacher uses to adjust the scores that students get on an examination one way or another. Gradually, grading on a curve improves students’ grades by raising their actual scores by a few notches, probably improving a letter grade.  Several teachers use curves to adjust the tests’ scores, while others choose to adjust the letter grades assigned to existing scores.

The term “curve” relates to” bell curve,” a statistical tool that shows the expected variation or normal distribution of any data set.  It is referred to as the bell curve because once the data has been graphically plotted, the shape formed is a hill or a bell.  In a standard distribution, the data is mostly near the center; otherwise, the mean, having hardly any figures on the bell’s outer part, referred to as outliers.  Everything else being equal, whenever test scores are typically distributed, 2.1% of students who took the test are going to receive a letter score of A, 13.6% will receive a B, 68% will get a C, 13.6% obtains Ds, and 2.1% of students in the class receive an F.

Why Does a Teacher Make Use of a Curve?

A teacher uses a bell curve to analyze the test they have, assuming that a bell curve will be visible if the material for the test presented is an excellent one. For example, suppose a teacher takes a look at the scores of their class and finds that the average (mean) grade of the midterm exam they gave was more or less a C, and quite a few students obtained a B and D with a few students getting an A and F. In that case, they can say that her test was designed appropriately.

How Does a Teacher Grade on a Curve?

Grading on a curve can be done in several ways, and many are mathematically challenging. The following are the most popular methods that teachers use curve grades, presented along with the fundamental explanation for each method:

Add Points: Each of the student’s grades is increased by the teacher using points of a similar number.

  • When Should it Be Applied? When the test is over, a teacher finds out that many kids could not answer questions 5 and 9 correctly. They may decide that the problems were written poorly or the instruction was inadequate. Thus, they increase the affected students’ scores by giving them credit for questions 5 and 9.
  • Benefits: All of the students receive a better grade.
  • Drawbacks: The students cannot answer questions 5 and 9 unless the lesson is retaught.

One hundred percent grade bump: A teacher raises the student’s score who received the highest score to a hundred percent and raises the rest of the student’s scores by the same margin.

  • When Should it be Applied? If no student receives a score of 100%, and the nearest one happens to be 88%, they can add 12 percentage points to that student’s score so that it becomes 100%. They can also add that same percentage point to everybody else’s grade.
  • Benefits: All of the students receive a higher score.
  • Drawbacks: Students who receive low grades don’t benefit that much.

Who Threw Off the Curve?

Students in a class often accuse one person of throwing off the curve. So, what does that mean, and how were they able to do it? There is a theory that the student who aces an exam that everyone else has trouble with is going to “throw off the curve.” For example, if most testers earned 70% and only one student in the whole class got an A, a 98%, then when the teacher goes to adjust the grades, that outlier will make it more difficult for other students to get a higher score. Here are a few examples that use the two methods of curved grading from above:

  • If a teacher wanted to increase the points for questions missed to everybody’s grade, but 98% is the top grade, she cannot add two more points as it will give that student a score of more than 100%.
  • If the teacher wanted to bump students’ grades to 100%, they would only receive two additional points, which is not a remarkable jump.

Grading on a Curve – What Is Wrong with It?

When teachers use the curve as the basis for the grades, it puts a cap on the number of students who can excel.  Therefore, the forced grade becomes a disincentive for studying. Remember, the score is not the exam’s point; it is teaching your students about learning new things.

Previous Article

How to Start Homeschooling in New York

Next Article

How to Start Homeschooling in North Carolina

Matthew Lynch

Related articles More from author

  • Assessment

    How To Assess Your Students’ Reading Progress

    May 19, 2021
    By Matthew Lynch
  • Assessment

    Self-Concept & Academic Performance: A Crucial Link

    April 13, 2021
    By Matthew Lynch
  • AssessmentTesting

    Strategies for Reducing Essay Grading Time

    April 30, 2018
    By Matthew Lynch
  • Assessment

    4 Tips for Developing Your Child’s IFSP Effectively

    July 14, 2021
    By Matthew Lynch
  • AssessmentSpecial Education

    Individualized Transition Plan: A Guide

    February 7, 2022
    By Matthew Lynch
  • AssessmentHigher EducationK-12

    How Comparing Grades Can Stunt Your Intellectual Development

    March 22, 2019
    By Matthew Lynch

Search

Registration and Login

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Newsletter

Signup for The Edvocate Newsletter and have the latest in P-20 education news and opinion delivered to your email address!

RSS feed: Matthew on Education Week Matthew on Education Week

  • Au Revoir from Education Futures November 20, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • 6 Steps to Data-Driven Literacy Instruction October 17, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • Four Keys to a Modern IT Approach in K-12 Schools October 2, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • What's the Difference Between Burnout and Demoralization, and What Can Teachers Do About It? September 27, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • Revisiting Using Edtech for Bullying and Suicide Prevention September 10, 2018 Matthew Lynch

About Us

The Edvocate was created in 2014 to argue for shifts in education policy and organization in order to enhance the quality of education and the opportunities for learning afforded to P-20 students in America. What we envisage may not be the most straightforward or the most conventional ideas. We call for a relatively radical and certainly quite comprehensive reorganization of America’s P-20 system.

That reorganization, though, and the underlying effort, will have much to do with reviving the American education system, and reviving a national love of learning.  The Edvocate plans to be one of key architects of this revival, as it continues to advocate for education reform, equity, and innovation.

Newsletter

Signup for The Edvocate Newsletter and have the latest in P-20 education news and opinion delivered to your email address!

Contact

The Edvocate
910 Goddin Street
Richmond, VA 23230
(601) 630-5238
[email protected]
  • situs togel online
  • dentoto
  • situs toto 4d
  • situs toto slot
  • toto slot 4d
Copyright (c) 2026 Matthew Lynch. All rights reserved.