The Edvocate

Top Menu

Main Menu

  • Start Here
    • Our Brands
    • Governance
      • Lynch Education Consulting, LLC.
      • Dr. Lynch’s Personal Website
      • Careers
    • Write For Us
    • Books
    • The Tech Edvocate Product Guide
    • Contact Us
    • The Edvocate Podcast
    • Edupedia
    • Pedagogue
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • PreK-12
    • Assessment
    • Assistive Technology
    • Best PreK-12 Schools in America
    • Child Development
    • Classroom Management
    • Early Childhood
    • EdTech & Innovation
    • Education Leadership
    • Equity
    • First Year Teachers
    • Gifted and Talented Education
    • Special Education
    • Parental Involvement
    • Policy & Reform
    • Teachers
  • Higher Ed
    • Best Colleges and Universities
    • Best College and University Programs
    • HBCU’s
    • Diversity
    • Higher Education EdTech
    • Higher Education
    • International Education
  • Advertise
  • The Tech Edvocate Awards
    • The Awards Process
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2025 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2024 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2023 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2021 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2022 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2020 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2019 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2018 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2017 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Award Seals
  • Apps
    • GPA Calculator for College
    • GPA Calculator for High School
    • Cumulative GPA Calculator
    • Grade Calculator
    • Weighted Grade Calculator
    • Final Grade Calculator
  • The Tech Edvocate
  • Post a Job
  • AI Powered Personal Tutor

logo

The Edvocate

  • Start Here
    • Our Brands
    • Governance
      • Lynch Education Consulting, LLC.
      • Dr. Lynch’s Personal Website
        • My Speaking Page
      • Careers
    • Write For Us
    • Books
    • The Tech Edvocate Product Guide
    • Contact Us
    • The Edvocate Podcast
    • Edupedia
    • Pedagogue
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • PreK-12
    • Assessment
    • Assistive Technology
    • Best PreK-12 Schools in America
    • Child Development
    • Classroom Management
    • Early Childhood
    • EdTech & Innovation
    • Education Leadership
    • Equity
    • First Year Teachers
    • Gifted and Talented Education
    • Special Education
    • Parental Involvement
    • Policy & Reform
    • Teachers
  • Higher Ed
    • Best Colleges and Universities
    • Best College and University Programs
    • HBCU’s
    • Diversity
    • Higher Education EdTech
    • Higher Education
    • International Education
  • Advertise
  • The Tech Edvocate Awards
    • The Awards Process
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2025 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2024 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2023 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2021 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2022 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2020 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2019 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2018 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2017 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Award Seals
  • Apps
    • GPA Calculator for College
    • GPA Calculator for High School
    • Cumulative GPA Calculator
    • Grade Calculator
    • Weighted Grade Calculator
    • Final Grade Calculator
  • The Tech Edvocate
  • Post a Job
  • AI Powered Personal Tutor
  • 11 Fun and Creative Ways to Get Your Students Moving Every Day

  • 12 of the Best Free Grade Calculators for Teachers

  • OPINION: The Danger of Painting Male Teachers as Predators

  • Secondary Teachers, Can We Let You in on a Lesson Planning Secret

  • 10 EdTech Hacks for Every Classroom

  • Help! My Coworker Is Selling My Lessons Online

  • 10 Job Perks Your Friends Have, But You Don’t—Because You Teach

  • The Changing Landscape of Special Education Policy

  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: A Contested Terrain

  • Research Challenges in Special Education Inclusion

Teachers
Home›Teachers›Establishing Order In Your Classroom: Five Common Approaches to Classroom Management

Establishing Order In Your Classroom: Five Common Approaches to Classroom Management

By Matthew Lynch
August 23, 2016
0
Spread the love

This article introduces different classroom management approaches, with the self-discipline and the desist approach at opposite ends. There’s no single method for managing a classroom effectively, because different situations require different approaches. The root of the problem should be the key factor in deciding which approach should be used.

The Self-Discipline Approach

This approach is based on the belief that students are responsible individuals who can assess and correct their own misbehavior, and that teachers and students have trusting relationships built on respect. With its self-governing style, the self-discipline approach has four models, which are discussed next.

Inner Discipline

Developed by Barbara Coloroso, inner discipline takes a longer route in correcting student misbehavior. As the name indicates, the goal here is to help students develop inner discipline. When students have self-discipline, they will have control and responsibility for their own actions. Whether or not it’s a choice with a positive outcome, unless there is a threat to the student or others, teachers should let students make their own choices.

Using inner discipline, when students misbehave, teachers should ask what students and teachers could do together to change. Students and teachers cooperate to build a community where they share the power. An underlying premise of this approach is that students do not have lasting discipline when quick solutions such as reward systems are used.

According to Coloroso, there are three types of teachers: “brick-wall,” “jellyfish,” and “backbone.” As the names suggest, “brick-wall” teachers are strict, demanding students to follow the rules without questioning and there are no exceptions. “Jellyfish” teachers enforce the rules like the way a jellyfish moves. The rules are not clear, and teachers often change the rewards and punishments, so students cannot expect consistency from these teachers. Last, “backbone” teachers give strong support, but from behind.

Assertive Discipline

Although assertive discipline is based on the fact that teachers have the power to ask and require specific actions from students, this approach still has students’ best interests in mind. Canter found that teachers who use this discipline are not authoritarian, because they are forceful yet calm in enforcing the rules and limits. This discipline allows teachers to present clear rules. It gives students the clear idea that misbehaviors have consequences and that, if they want positive consequences instead of negative ones, they can make choices that will lead to positive consequences.
The Desist Approach

This approach is often used due to its easy implementation. Unlike the self-discipline, where students are responsible, the desist approach makes teachers the responsible party. This approach can be viewed as a power system, because teachers have the power, and they set the specific rules to give students discipline and correct student behaviors. The approach focuses on assertive discipline and behavior modification, as outlined next.

Behavior Modification

This approach centers around four types of punishment/reinforcement:
1. Positive reinforcement: Giving extra credit for a question answered with much thought

2. Positive punishment: A meeting with the principal

3. Negative reinforcement: Removal from list of students who have 
to answer questions

4. Negative punishment: Decrease in free time

In behavior modification, positive reinforcement is the most effective, while punishments are comparatively ineffective. It goes without saying that teachers are expected to encourage good student behavior instead of criticizing misbehavior.

Have you tried out any of these models? How did they go? What model works in one classroom may not be as effective with a different set of students. Think about the flow of your classroom and the needs of the children in it, and then decide what model would most effectively manage your classroom. If the models here don’t sound appealing, check out our two other articles on approaches to classroom management.

Tagsntchatreflective teacherteacher qualityteachered
Previous Article

Focus on These Four Areas to Create ...

Next Article

Objective Assessments: Are Choice-Based Tests Best for ...

Matthew Lynch

Related articles More from author

  • Policy & Reform

    Is breakfast in the classroom problematic?

    December 11, 2015
    By Matthew Lynch
  • EquityTeachers

    Ways to Promote Diverse Cultures in the Classroom

    April 13, 2016
    By Matthew Lynch
  • EdTech & InnovationPolicy & ReformTeachers

    STEM Learning Must Go Beyond Memorizing Facts and Theories

    June 8, 2016
    By Matthew Lynch
  • Matthew LynchTeachers

    Crossing Your T’s and Dotting Your I’s: Educational Policies and You

    September 19, 2016
    By Matthew Lynch
  • EdTech & Innovation

    Using twitter in the classroom – from the perspective of students

    September 20, 2016
    By Matthew Lynch
  • Higher Education

    Report: Higher education not translating to lower unemployment

    November 23, 2015
    By Matthew Lynch

Search

Registration and Login

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Newsletter

Signup for The Edvocate Newsletter and have the latest in P-20 education news and opinion delivered to your email address!

RSS Matthew on Education Week

  • Au Revoir from Education Futures November 20, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • 6 Steps to Data-Driven Literacy Instruction October 17, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • Four Keys to a Modern IT Approach in K-12 Schools October 2, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • What's the Difference Between Burnout and Demoralization, and What Can Teachers Do About It? September 27, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • Revisiting Using Edtech for Bullying and Suicide Prevention September 10, 2018 Matthew Lynch

About Us

The Edvocate was created in 2014 to argue for shifts in education policy and organization in order to enhance the quality of education and the opportunities for learning afforded to P-20 students in America. What we envisage may not be the most straightforward or the most conventional ideas. We call for a relatively radical and certainly quite comprehensive reorganization of America’s P-20 system.

That reorganization, though, and the underlying effort, will have much to do with reviving the American education system, and reviving a national love of learning.  The Edvocate plans to be one of key architects of this revival, as it continues to advocate for education reform, equity, and innovation.

Newsletter

Signup for The Edvocate Newsletter and have the latest in P-20 education news and opinion delivered to your email address!

Contact

The Edvocate
910 Goddin Street
Richmond, VA 23230
(601) 630-5238
[email protected]
  • situs togel online
  • dentoto
  • situs toto 4d
  • situs toto slot
  • toto slot 4d
Copyright (c) 2025 Matthew Lynch. All rights reserved.