The air buzzed with anticipation in the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s student union as students gathered to watch the first presidential debate. Pizza boxes piled high, and excited chatter filled the room. But as the debate unfolded, the energy shifted. A sense of disappointment and disengagement settled in, leaving many students feeling uninspired.

“I expected more,” said Sarah, a junior majoring in political science. “It was just a lot of yelling and interruptions. I didn’t feel like I learned anything new.” Many echoed Sarah’s sentiment, frustrated by the lack of substantive policy discussion and the constant bickering between the candidates.

“I’m not sure I’m even more informed now than I was before,” admitted Michael, a history student. “It felt like they were just talking past each other, not really engaging with the issues.” The debate’s focus on personal attacks and accusations instead of concrete plans for the future left many students feeling disillusioned with the political process.

While some found the debate entertaining, for many, it lacked the depth and seriousness they expected. The absence of clear policy proposals on crucial issues like climate change and healthcare left students wanting more.

The debate’s impact on voter turnout remains to be seen. However, the apathy felt by many students at the watch party highlights a growing concern about the state of political discourse. With so much at stake, students are yearning for a dialogue that prioritizes substance over spectacle and inspires them to participate in shaping the future of their country.