The recent publication of a “100 Best Books of All Time” list has sparked heated debate among literary circles. While the selection boasts familiar classics and celebrated authors, it has also ignited controversy, leaving some critics questioning the list’s validity and the very notion of a definitive “best.”

To get a diverse perspective on this contentious topic, we gathered three prominent book critics: Eleanor Davies, known for her sharp analysis of modern fiction; James Thompson, a respected historian of literature; and Sofia Ramirez, a champion of underrepresented voices.

Eleanor Davies: “This list feels like a regurgitation of the same old classics, ignoring the richness and diversity of literature beyond the Western canon. It’s a missed opportunity to highlight powerful voices from marginalized communities, and to introduce readers to groundbreaking works that challenge the status quo.”

James Thompson: “It’s understandable that a list like this will always be subjective. However, I’m concerned about the lack of historical context. Some entries, while undoubtedly influential, are presented as timeless masterpieces, neglecting the social and political landscapes in which they were written.”

Sofia Ramirez: “The very idea of a definitive ‘best’ is problematic. Literature is a constantly evolving dialogue, and what resonates with one reader might not with another. I’m more interested in exploring the multiplicity of experiences and perspectives that literature offers.”

Eleanor Davies: “I believe that the focus on ‘best’ inherently excludes important works that may not fit traditional criteria. What about books that push boundaries, explore uncomfortable truths, or offer a unique artistic vision?”

James Thompson: “Perhaps the list serves a valuable purpose in introducing readers to new titles. But it shouldn’t be treated as gospel. It’s important to recognize that each individual reader has their own journey of discovery, and that’s what makes literature so fascinating.”

Sofia Ramirez: “I’d prefer to see lists that highlight themes, genres, or specific movements within literature. This would provide a more nuanced understanding of the vast and multifaceted landscape of books.”

Eleanor Davies: “Ultimately, the power of literature lies in its ability to connect us to others, to challenge our assumptions, and to expand our understanding of the world. We should encourage readers to explore diverse voices and perspectives, rather than relying on a single, limited list.”

James Thompson: “I agree. While these lists may be helpful for some, they should never dictate what we read or how we experience literature. Let us embrace the richness and complexity of the written word, and discover our own “best” along the way.”

Sofia Ramirez: “Indeed. Let’s remember that literature is a journey, not a destination. And the journey itself is what truly matters.”

This debate highlights the inherent challenges of creating a “best” list, but also reveals the enduring power of literature to spark dialogue and inspire individual journeys of discovery.