The Edvocate

Top Menu

Main Menu

  • Start Here
    • Our Brands
    • Governance
      • Lynch Education Consulting, LLC.
      • Dr. Lynch’s Personal Website
      • Careers
    • Write For Us
    • Books
    • The Tech Edvocate Product Guide
    • Contact Us
    • The Edvocate Podcast
    • Edupedia
    • Pedagogue
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • PreK-12
    • Assessment
    • Assistive Technology
    • Best PreK-12 Schools in America
    • Child Development
    • Classroom Management
    • Early Childhood
    • EdTech & Innovation
    • Education Leadership
    • Equity
    • First Year Teachers
    • Gifted and Talented Education
    • Special Education
    • Parental Involvement
    • Policy & Reform
    • Teachers
  • Higher Ed
    • Best Colleges and Universities
    • Best College and University Programs
    • HBCU’s
    • Diversity
    • Higher Education EdTech
    • Higher Education
    • International Education
  • Advertise
  • The Tech Edvocate Awards
    • The Awards Process
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2025 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2024 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2023 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2021 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2022 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2020 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2019 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2018 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2017 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Award Seals
  • Apps
    • GPA Calculator for College
    • GPA Calculator for High School
    • Cumulative GPA Calculator
    • Grade Calculator
    • Weighted Grade Calculator
    • Final Grade Calculator
  • The Tech Edvocate
  • Post a Job
  • AI Powered Personal Tutor

logo

The Edvocate

  • Start Here
    • Our Brands
    • Governance
      • Lynch Education Consulting, LLC.
      • Dr. Lynch’s Personal Website
        • My Speaking Page
      • Careers
    • Write For Us
    • Books
    • The Tech Edvocate Product Guide
    • Contact Us
    • The Edvocate Podcast
    • Edupedia
    • Pedagogue
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
  • PreK-12
    • Assessment
    • Assistive Technology
    • Best PreK-12 Schools in America
    • Child Development
    • Classroom Management
    • Early Childhood
    • EdTech & Innovation
    • Education Leadership
    • Equity
    • First Year Teachers
    • Gifted and Talented Education
    • Special Education
    • Parental Involvement
    • Policy & Reform
    • Teachers
  • Higher Ed
    • Best Colleges and Universities
    • Best College and University Programs
    • HBCU’s
    • Diversity
    • Higher Education EdTech
    • Higher Education
    • International Education
  • Advertise
  • The Tech Edvocate Awards
    • The Awards Process
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2025 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2024 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2023 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2021 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2022 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2020 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2019 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2018 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Finalists and Winners of The 2017 Tech Edvocate Awards
    • Award Seals
  • Apps
    • GPA Calculator for College
    • GPA Calculator for High School
    • Cumulative GPA Calculator
    • Grade Calculator
    • Weighted Grade Calculator
    • Final Grade Calculator
  • The Tech Edvocate
  • Post a Job
  • AI Powered Personal Tutor
  • Help! My Coworker Is Selling My Lessons Online

  • 10 Job Perks Your Friends Have, But You Don’t—Because You Teach

  • The Changing Landscape of Special Education Policy

  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: A Contested Terrain

  • Research Challenges in Special Education Inclusion

  • School Safety and Communication Technologies

  • Special Education Leadership: Preparing for Future Challenges

  • Budget Challenges and Institutional Sustainability

  • Career and Technical Education: Preparing for Future Workforce Needs

  • Funding Challenges in Special Education

Retention & Social Promotion SeriesTrending Topics
Home›Retention & Social Promotion Series›Pass or Fail: An Ideal Multi-Age Classroom

Pass or Fail: An Ideal Multi-Age Classroom

By Matthew Lynch
May 7, 2018
0
Spread the love

In this multi-part series, I provide a dissection of the phenomenon of retention and social promotion. Also, I describe the many different methods that would improve student instruction in classrooms and eliminate the need for retention and social promotion if combined effectively.

While reading this series, periodically ask yourself this question: Why are educators, parents and the American public complicit in a practice that does demonstrable harm to children and the competitive future of the country?

Obviously a multi-age classroom has children of different ages – but other than that factor, what would an ideal multi-age classroom look like?

The often idealized model – the model that is more specifically targeted to educational outcomes and the developmental benefit of the child – concentrates on creating a diverse but balanced grouping of students of mixed ages and mixed abilities. In the most idealized model, the notion of having mixed abilities also extends to including both children who are gifted and those with special needs in the classroom at a ratio that promotes mainstream inclusion.

The theory behind this is that there are tremendous benefits to a social and natural setting that is enhanced with these levels of diversity (based on age as well as ability). Specifically, these types of multi-age classrooms can help to improve or otherwise enhance the social and emotional skills of students.

Some research on early childhood multi-age grouping has shown that stu­dent disobedience is much less common in multi-age groupings compared to single-age classrooms. Higher language development has also been noted in multi-age groupings compared to single-age classrooms. It is thought that this is because there is more language exchange among mixed-age children.

Research conducted in the 1960s demonstrated that there were significant gains in reading and language-skills areas for students in multi-age classrooms, especially compared to peers in single-age classrooms. Although there is little recent research to replicate these findings, some recent studies have targeted multi-age classrooms. These studies showed evidence of higher and faster cognitive development for those in multi-age classrooms compared to those in single-age classrooms.

Other research has found that the first day of school is far more relaxed and comfortable for students and teachers in multi-age classrooms in elementary schools. The pressures are lower, for two reasons. First, the environment is familiar to a portion of the student population. Second, the teacher is familiar with the students and, in the case of a teacher who has been in the same position for some time, with the process of managing the classroom and integrating new students moving forward. Student worries about grade retention or social promotion – a major source of anxiety for many students – are not applicable in the multi-age classroom, and thus the classroom is less stressful than its multi-age counterpart.

A key advantage of the multi-age classroom is that it lets students learn at an individualized pace, working to reach their full potential but in their own time. Teachers often tend to have more motivation to focus on the progress of individual students within the multi-age classroom. This focus is better supported in the multi-age environment, especially as an alternative to moving through textbooks or working on a rigid schedule, as so many teachers must of necessity do in a single-age classroom.

The student-centered, project-based learning environment is more likely to emerge when there is this kind of motivation and focus. Students of different levels are better able to pay attention to individual projects. The underlying curriculum can be designed to challenge the knowledge and abilities of the individual student. Work can be more easily designed to challenge specific knowledge and abilities with the student-centered, project-based approach, especially when compared to the common curriculum.

With the right approach, multi-age classrooms can meet the needs of each student in them and help break the unhelpful cycle of social promotion and retention.

TagsK-12retentionretention and social promotion seriessocial promotionstudents
Previous Article

5 Things that Educators Want from Webinars

Next Article

3 Benefits of Microlearning for Corporate Employees

Matthew Lynch

Related articles More from author

  • Education LeadershipTeachers

    Empowering students and lessons in giving constructive feedback

    June 19, 2016
    By Matthew Lynch
  • Policy & ReformRetention & Social Promotion SeriesTrending Topics

    Pass or Fail: The Need for Alternative Strategies

    June 15, 2017
    By Matthew Lynch
  • Current Ed News

    K-12 Public School Facilities Underfunded

    April 13, 2016
    By Matthew Lynch
  • Policy & ReformRetention & Social Promotion SeriesTrending Topics

    Pass or Fail: The Psychological Effects of Social Promotion and Retention

    May 31, 2017
    By Matthew Lynch
  • Policy & ReformTrending Topics

    Pass or Fail: The Objectives of America’s Public Education System

    July 27, 2017
    By Matthew Lynch
  • EquityOpEducation

    Can K-12 Schools Protect Religious Freedom alongside Secular Humanism?

    March 26, 2016
    By Matthew Lynch

Search

Registration and Login

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Newsletter

Signup for The Edvocate Newsletter and have the latest in P-20 education news and opinion delivered to your email address!

RSS Matthew on Education Week

  • Au Revoir from Education Futures November 20, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • 6 Steps to Data-Driven Literacy Instruction October 17, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • Four Keys to a Modern IT Approach in K-12 Schools October 2, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • What's the Difference Between Burnout and Demoralization, and What Can Teachers Do About It? September 27, 2018 Matthew Lynch
  • Revisiting Using Edtech for Bullying and Suicide Prevention September 10, 2018 Matthew Lynch

About Us

The Edvocate was created in 2014 to argue for shifts in education policy and organization in order to enhance the quality of education and the opportunities for learning afforded to P-20 students in America. What we envisage may not be the most straightforward or the most conventional ideas. We call for a relatively radical and certainly quite comprehensive reorganization of America’s P-20 system.

That reorganization, though, and the underlying effort, will have much to do with reviving the American education system, and reviving a national love of learning.  The Edvocate plans to be one of key architects of this revival, as it continues to advocate for education reform, equity, and innovation.

Newsletter

Signup for The Edvocate Newsletter and have the latest in P-20 education news and opinion delivered to your email address!

Contact

The Edvocate
910 Goddin Street
Richmond, VA 23230
(601) 630-5238
[email protected]
  • situs togel online
  • dentoto
  • situs toto 4d
  • situs toto slot
  • toto slot 4d
Copyright (c) 2025 Matthew Lynch. All rights reserved.