3 Real Facts About Behind the Senate’s Refusal to Consider Climate Change Education
The latest version of “No Child Left Behind” had a section that would have created climate change curriculum for K-12 students.
However, the Senate said “no” to this portion of the bill.
Why did this happen? Let’s look at the facts behind this decision.
- According to theHill.com, the measure failed 44-53.
“The measure, from Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), would have created a grant program for school districts to “develop or improve climate science curriculum and supplementary education materials,” according to the amendment text. It failed on a 44-53 vote.”
- Chair of the Senate H.E.L.P. Committee (Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions) Lamar Alexander said that he wasn’t fond of the measure because it further inserts the federal government into public education. But that wasn’t all…
- Alexander believes in climate change but is afraid that allowing the amendment to pass would, in essence, create a slippery slope due to political partisanship.
Interesting that politics is the reason why a measure like this failed. Climate change is real and has been proven by simple science. While the development of the curriculum hopefully wouldn’t grow around partisan ideas, giving baseline information on climate change and its impact on the earth seems fairly logical.
Explaining why temperatures in the ocean continue to rise, why the polar ice caps are melting, and why tornadoes have gotten more powerful is information all students should know. This attack on climate change as “made up” is not helpful to anyone — least of all the next generation of adults who will deal with this on an even larger scale.
Hopefully the Senate tries again with rewritten language and passes the measure. Our students need to learn about climate change and at an early age.